Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semantic perception

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:06, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semantic perception[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is written like an advertisement (All "further reading" sources have the author Amit Sheth). Also, not enough context to describe the topic. Tal Brenev (talk) 22:45, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems like promotional b.s. If substantial coverage in reliable independent sources emerges, please let me know and I will reconsider. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- To verify the "reliable independent sources" for this idea, the citations in the Further Reading section have been linked to the papers on the Publisher's website. Please have a look at the references and note that the Publishers of this work and the associated conferences are quite reliable (IEEE Sensors Conference, Applied Ontology Journal, IEEE Internet Computing, International Semantic Web Conference). Coryhenson (talk) 18:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The papers seem like they are original research, which can't be used a source. Tal Brenev (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Tal Brenev[reply]
Delete. Original SYN. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per Xxanthippe. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.