Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semantic annotation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Annotation. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semantic annotation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically a micro-essay with no real context. Unclear how it could ever be expanded. South Nashua (talk) 00:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:00, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala (talk) 01:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a merge or redirect to Annotation. I see Uanfala has just deletion sorted it for computing but I thought it was linguistics -- anyway, both are sections in Annotation. Literary annotations, too. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm okay with withdrawing and making a redirect. South Nashua (talk) 13:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete minor stub with no indication of independent notability. Little more than WP:DICTDEF. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.