Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sema Soygeniş

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sema Soygeniş[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. [evolutionoftheuniverse] ^@enwiki 18:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the nominator. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:ARCHITECT and WP:GNG. I found no reliable sources in my research. ~Styyx ^{Talk? ^-^} 16:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable architect.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete references cannot be verified. Formatting is incorrect. Expertwikiguy (talk) 01:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not seeing a case for notability... happy to be proved wrong though. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:57, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.