Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. unsourced spm posted by paid editors Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Selux[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-sourced promotional piece by "the official editorial office of the company", relying on inherited notability through some vague unspecified contribution to the 9/11 Museum. Also falls foul of WP:PAID. Cabayi (talk) 13:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. A search on the web turned up nothing of note either for Selux or Semperlux. Domdeparis (talk) 13:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.