Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selina Shirley Hastings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 01:17, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Selina Shirley Hastings[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No proof of notability, existing isn't enough. Jerodlycett (talk) 13:28, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Jerodlycett (talk) 13:28, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think we can presume notability due to the designation of Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature. EricEnfermero (Talk) 21:03, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I added several reviews of her works in major publications. I think it makes a pretty strong case for WP:AUTHOR criterion 4c. EricEnfermero (Talk) 16:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The author seems to think that nobility equals notability. FRSL is not quite enough - we need a couple of other references. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - notability is spare, and it is not inherited from distant relatives. When and if she succeeds to a title, then we can re-visit this issue. Bearian (talk) 20:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per RHaworth (talk · contribs) and Bearian (talk · contribs).Keep. Subject of the article meet WP:AUTHOR. Many thanks to EricEnfermero. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 14:56, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per users Wikic¤l¤gy, RHaworth, and Bearian. WordSeventeen (talk) 15:06, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-: I just reviewed the article again after EricEnfermero recent edit on the article. I think the subject of the article easily meet WP:AUTHOR. Sorry that I have to change my Delete vote to Keep. Apologize that I did a critical review before my initial vote. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 18:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per EricEnfermero - meets WP:Author. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 19:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.