Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selin Köseoğlu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I agree with Geschichte here. We are considering deleting an article that other editors have created and worked on. There needs to be a thorough BEFORE done and a better deletion rationale that "Fails WP:GNG". If a BEFORE was done, than please include that information in your nomination statement. Liz Read! Talk! 19:33, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Selin Köseoğlu[edit]

Selin Köseoğlu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Kadı Message 12:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep :@Kadı Quoting WP:CREATIVE The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series). I believe the person satisfies this with two separate works: Price of Passion and İkinci Bahar. Koseoglu's role is important in both works, and both works have received very significant press coverage. Gorkem80 (talk) 15:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural keep, the nomination does not address the state of the article in any way. Geschichte (talk) 08:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I mean that you threw in a boilerplate reason for deletion without tying it to the article in any way. Geschichte (talk) 11:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.