Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Self-Injurious Behavior Inhibiting System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Self-Injurious Behavior Inhibiting System[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are zero review articles on this topic from the last 20 years on pubmed. Not notable. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator yes not much peer reviewed literature but their are textbooks so agree notable and withdraw the nomination. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I see plenty of GBooks hits, including one published just few days ago: W. Scott Terry (27 August 2015). Learning and Memory: Basic Principles, Processes, and Procedures, Fourth Edition. Psychology Press. p. 140. ISBN 978-1-317-35087-3. Seems like there are plenty of sources; if you disagree and reply here, ping me. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have trimmed some poorly sourced content on effectiveness. Yes the textbooks supports notability agree Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Piotrus, in fact, there was an entire book chapter (in a Springer-published book) written about this device: [1] Besides that significant coverage in reliable sources can be found here, here, and here, as well as in the Boston Magazine article I already added as a source to the page. Everymorning (talk) 15:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.