Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seiklus (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:40, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seiklus[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Article subject appears to be non-notable per WP:GNG, relies heavily on bare links and first party and self published sources of information. The article also appears highly WP:Promotional. BlitzGreg (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 21:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I see coverage in all of the major RSes. Edge calls it a "minor masterpiece". Gamasutra calls it a "superstar of the modern indie scene." It's listed as #13 in 1up's "Definitive guide to the best new freeware games on the web". Quite a bit of coverage at indiegames.com... I'd recommend searching for ways this article can be improved per WP:BEFORE. -Thibbs (talk) 11:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Besides the above hits, there are more (e.g. [1]) in a custom WP:VG/RS Google search. I agree that the article needs to be improved. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.