Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seigo Nakao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep; non-admin closure. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seigo Nakao[edit]

Article fails to assert notability per WP:NOTE. Musashi1600 (talk) 07:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 11:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 01:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Weak Keep Head of a department at a university. But the real notability is being the editor of several major standard Japanese-English dictionaries, . The editor of a major reference work is notable. XXanthippe, what are the reasons for your !vote? I'd like a chance to show why they dont apply, but you need to say what they are. DGG (talk) 11:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as I stated when it was de-prodded, he passes WP:PROF by authoring a reference work that is widely used/cited. Neier (talk) 12:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Neier: meets WP:PROF #3. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:07, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per DGG & Neier. Espresso Addict (talk) 10:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.