Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seeing Red (Band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted as A7. Notability assertions must actually meet a relevent SNG or GNG--an assertion of airplay alone doesn't meet WP:BAND criteria 11. Jclemens (talk) 05:37, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing Red (Band)[edit]

Fails WP:BAND as the subject hasn't been discussed in any depth by multiple, independant, reliable sources; nor has the band recieved any major awards or charted any hits. Them From Space 20:57, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete cunder A7, absolutely no assertion of notability. --neon white talk 23:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For what its worth, the article asserts that they have been featured on many local and online radio stations. Them From Space 23:35, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not if you ask me. Any Joe and the Nobodies band (that actually would be a good name for a rock band) can get airplay on a local radio station. My local radio station regularly plays a metric buttload of acts that fail WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thats why I nominated it for deletion. I'm just saying it doesnt fit in with CSD as it makes an assertion of notability. Them From Space 06:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:48, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.