Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sedona Underground

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Note: I did a Google site search on those two news websites mentioned in this AfD for Sedona Underground (because I thought someone should) and came up blank on both. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 13:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Sedona Underground

Sedona Underground (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Speedy deleted in September as A7, re-created almost immediately by the same editor with what looks like the same content, tagged today as G11 (blatant spam). Not sure about thet, but I don't see any credible evidence of notability or of non-trivial independent sources. Plenty of spammy-looking weblinks, not much in the way of wikilinks (in or out). Guy (Help!) 19:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

• I'm in Chandler, never seen
  Any stories on 12 or 3
  It means something at our wiki:
  It gets a speedy delete! TTV|talk|contribs|email 00:26, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep One of the few things I've actually heard of, besides the World Cup match, on AfD. On the other hand, I am a connoisseur of hoaxes and conspiracy theories, in addition to being an artist, and I can't quite figure out why it is so familiar. My local news stations seems not to have heard of the country Saudi Arabia so I'm not sure that that rates very high. KP Botany 19:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep There is no connection to any business. For people in the Pheonix area, anything north of the Mogollon Rim often is not covered by the metropolitan's media sources, so any arts community must seem surprise. Most of the people on the list don't watch television, let alone have one. However, in the Verde Valley, specifically Sedona, the local, non-gallery art scene is expanding rapidly as stories covered by two other newspapers: Verde Independent and The Red Rock Review and a Sedona TV 16, a public access channel for local residents. Foxthepoet 01:57, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This seems a bit WP:LOCAL to me, and the newsletter coverage seems to back this up. The real reason for my !vote is the fact that the article cites no "multiple third-party reliable sources" verifying any of the info in it, nor as a measure of notability. In addition the article is crufty in the extreme (cruft == high level of detail inappropriate for an encyclopedic "arm's length" treatment of the subject in question). Zunaid©^{Please rate me at Editor Review!} 14:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Wouldn't even consider this notable on a local level. Zilch in the way of third party sources and Google results for the term "sedona underground" show zilch in the way of non-wiki links, other than Foxthepoet's MySpace. Spammy listcruft. ⇔ EntChickie 22:48, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.