Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secure image encryption technique for wireless network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Secure image encryption technique for wireless network[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rejected speedy, rejected prod

Very new article so some WP:AGF has to apply, but this is a hugely broad conjunction of three notable (and already covered) aspects with nothing whatsoever to make their combination additionally notable. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:42, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now until a better article can be made as I found nothing convincingly good. Pinging 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR. SwisterTwister talk 06:11, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - encryption technique from a very recent 2015 paper, with no citations yet[1] Unable to find any WP:reliable sources mentioning the technique. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 17:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article is very basic with only one reference. Its also not very clear. I don't see any explanation of if or why the only technique mentioned (block based transmission) is well suited for images or wireless networks in particular. Perhaps anything that is worth saving could be folded into this article: Cryptographic protocol but I agree this article should be deleted. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 02:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.