Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secuestro
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 04:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Secuestro[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Secuestro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a film, not properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NFILM. The only attempt at a notability claim here is that it won awards from student film competitions -- but our notability tests for films only care about film awards that can be reliably sourced as significant, and don't just indiscriminately accept every single film award that exists. Otherwise, this is written rather more like an advertisement than a proper encyclopedia article, and isn't citing any reliable or WP:GNG-worthy sourcing for anything else either. Bearcat (talk) 03:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Dominican Republic, and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 03:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete No claim to notability. Llajwa (talk) 23:20, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.