Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Section 84

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Section 84[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Shelved movie per [1]. Article was made before principal photography commenced. Currently the article is a mess and has been spammed as much as possible. Fails WP:NFILM and was a case of WP:TOSOON. Jupitus Smart 16:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:22, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:22, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:HAMMER. It is unclear if this has actually been released widely. Bearian (talk) 19:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a film which apparently hasn't even been made yet (principal photography was cancelled), and may not ever actually be made. There are numerous aborted projects in the film industry, and the vast majority (if not all) of them will not be notable enough for an article. In order for such an aborted film project to be notable enough for an article, it would need to be somehow exceptional, and I don't see any evidence this is exceptional. SJK (talk) 20:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.