Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secrets and lies first generation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 09:32, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Secrets and lies first generation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source is a Facebook page, a wholly unreliable citation, there are no mentions of sources that could confirm claims it makes, and as such neither the article nor its subject appear notable. dci | TALK 05:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't establish notability at all, probably self-promotional, no wikilinks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmajeremy (talk • contribs) 06:44, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is clearly a promotional article and there's absolutely zero sources out there about this self-published ebook. (Bookbaby is a self-publishing company.)Tokyogirl79 (talk) 19:27, 10 March 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

Delete as spam. -- Whpq (talk) 17:05, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.