Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Battle Group controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:58, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Second Battle Group controversy[edit]

Second Battle Group controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was originally titled "Second Battle Group" with content about an unremarkable military re-enactment group, per this edit. Following a 2007 TV exposé about the unsavoury opinions of two of its members, the page became involved in a short but bloody edit war, culminating in its content being predominantly about this documentary, and the page was eventually move to its current title to reflect this. I don't feel that the group is notable per WP:CLUB, and the news coverage fails WP:LASTING. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 09:52, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 10:00, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Nick-D (talk) 10:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NOTNEWS, though I am tempted to keep it purely for the content where members of this Nazi reenactment group are quoted as being surprised that some members of the group were in fact Nazi sympathisers! Nick-D (talk) 10:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — Per dom Kaos rationale for nominating coupled with what Nick-D said. Celestina007 (talk) 17:56, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - there's nothing notable anymore. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 19:20, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Title is POV and there is not enough coverage about the subject. desmay (talk) 03:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.