Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Behmann

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Studio Other Spaces. Another redirect was also mention. If you would like to change the target, please start a discussion on the redirect talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 05:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastian Behmann[edit]

Sebastian Behmann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NBIO. The first ref (Riba Journal) seems to be a RS and has significant coverage. The other refs are just of the type that mention him as an architect/designer of a project that is the main subject of the article. Searching finds many more like these, but not more with in-depth coverage. Redirected to Studio Olafur Eliasson as an WP:ATD-R. MB 03:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Germany. MB 03:01, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Studio Other Spaces. The sources I've found almost exclusively cover Behmann in relation to his partnership with Eliasson. We already have an article for that and it would be sufficient to cover this topic there. Sources do not show him to be independently notable from that collaboratory partnership. czar 07:39, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, they are equal partners, working together from different perspectives (artistic and architectural respectively). According to the comments, the article has been updated with information about Behmann's importance as an architect. More references to significant material have been added to the list of references. Михайло (talk) 17:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:15, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 14:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.