Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seb Sargent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 06:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seb Sargent[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced this person meets requirements of WP:BIO - I can't see how it meets the standards set for creatives, plus the articles referenced are primarily about specific actions they've done, rather than establishing overall notability, Mike1901 (talk) 12:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Mike1901 (talk) 12:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Transportation, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The Independent article looks to be the best, until you open it and see it's about another person doing imitations of this fellow. BBC is the individual appearing in an ad with the transport secretary for the nation, fine, but nothing for GNG. Rest are cast lists and non-RS. Oaktree b (talk) 15:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this. I understand the accessible toilets controversy and that being a big part of the article, but the rest is just a very thin resume of this person's accomplishments and professional potential. Doesn't make for a worthwhile article. Bl00velvet (talk) 06:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No notability, and sources are either mentions or primary (and the New York Post). The disabled incident is unfortunately a regular occurrence worldwide and doesn't make him any more special because of his "fame" from making train announcements. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 06:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.