Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Michael Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Michael Smith[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity article with substantial contributions by a single-topic IP. Subject fails WP:NACTOR, WP:FILMMAKER and WP:MUSICBIO, as well as WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Subject appears to have had several non-notable, extra or minor acting roles; and some dated, but minimal, local coverage related to subject's high school achievements. Subject also appears on several self-edited music websites and benefits from unrelated coverage about other individuals with the exact same name. Article also relies heavily on notability by association. But upon review, no coverage of the subject warrants inclusion; despite the well-written, but deceptive, appearance to the contrary. X4n6 (talk) 05:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clear vanity page. Should have been a speedy. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - subject lacks coverage to meet WP:GNG, and his roles and projects to date do not meet WP:NACTOR or WP:MUSICBIO. gongshow talk 06:11, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion for non notable individuals. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:54, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.