Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Cann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Cann[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had previously prodded this because the first sentence said the player was semi-pro. I assumed that meant he would fail WP:ATHLETE. The creator of the article since removed that line and my prod.

The player plays for Lincoln United. I don't know if that's a pro team or not sufficient for the ATHLETE criteria. Seems to me that it's not. Shadowjams (talk) 21:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The highest level where the subject has played is the Northern Premier League, three levels below the fully professional leagues, and I can find no evidence of his passing the general notability guideline. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:56, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails both Wp:ATHLETE (having never played in a fully-pro league) and Wp:GNG. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 18:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-professional sportsman, clearly fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails ATHLETE having not played anywhere near high enough league, fails GNG as there is no in depth coverage, only local match report type passing mentions, half of which are on leagues own website--ClubOranje^T 07:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Clearly doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE. XXX antiuser ^eh? 10:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.