Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Basilio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Basilio[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG per only WP:ROUTINE sources. Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Yosemiter (talk) 16:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:13, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:13, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Another of the many hundreds of NN articles created by Dolovis in open and knowing defiance of consensus concerning applicable notability guidelines, and for which he received a community ban from new article creation. Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence the subject -- a minor league journeyman with an ephemeral career and no honors that meet any notability criteria -- meets the GNG. Ravenswing 08:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - falls well short of NHOCKEY and not finding significant coverage. Rlendog (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searches returned nothing to show they pass WP:GNG, and as already pointed out, does not meet WP:NHOCKEY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet WP:NHOCKEY.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.