Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seacom Engineering College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seacom Engineering College[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seeking redirect to Howrah or Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology for failing WP:GNG.

There's nil coverage except over these three links. I am a native speaker of Bangla (the vernacular language of the region) and can confirm that there's no coverage of the institute in regional sources. ∯WBG^converse 12:08, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG^converse 12:08, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG^converse 12:08, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:15, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Accredited degree-awarding institutions are usually kept. Not part of the university, just affiliated to it, so no reason for redirect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Do we need a re-run of this episode? ∯WBG^converse 12:32, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
How very sad that you have dredged up that shameful example of attempted bullying of an editor into not expressing their opinion (note comments by Kudpung and DGG); it really does not reflect well on you that you have chosen to do so. I might almost think you were threatening me and/or trying to shut down my opinion. Let's not have any more unpleasantness like that. There's no place for it on Wikipedia. I am entitled to express an opinion and I have done so. End of. Also note that discussion (and the RfC) was about secondary schools, not tertiary institutions; please don't try to extend it to something it did not cover. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:30, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. If sufficient sources can be found I will gladly change to keep. We still have to follow verifiability standards of multiple sources. One source is not enough.4meter4 (talk) 01:36, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:43, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Institutions about which nobody writes are not notable. Rockphed (talk) 13:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.