Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scrum in Marketing Department

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:00, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Scrum in Marketing Department[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two recent articles that take a notable topic with an existing article, Scrum (software development) and then fill it with a badly written and unsourced pile of OR blather. Neither of these justify their presence here. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:09, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom as unreferenced original research. Philg88 ^♦talk 16:22, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and as minimally intelligible conslutant[sic]-speak. --Finngall ^talk 22:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. SW3 5DL (talk) 22:35, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.