Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scripted Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:04, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scripted Magazine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Magazine published by and for a grammar school. Article basically consists of a listing of the two issues published up till now and fascinating tidbits of information like the surface of the school (61,606m2). Article PRODded because of a lack of independent sources, dePRODded without stated reason. In the absence of any evidence of notability: Delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 20:03, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Kudos to the students for putting out the magazine, but there is no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:47, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 01:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 04:35, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gonna have to agree with Whpq on this. Delete for lack of notability. Unfortunately. Especially because I like that cover art as exists on the article. Good luck to the students getting this out there. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:36, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No independent references. Not notable. Wikipelli ^Talk 11:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Like most student run things, non-notable. SL93 (talk) 20:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As above, the magazine is not notable - the only result of it in a Google search was the magazine's website. Oddbodz (talk) 22:34, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.