Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ScreenRacer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:47, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ScreenRacer[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A screen saver program that does not appear to have any notability. The references used currently in the article are either primary sources, or unreliable sources such as forum posts. Doing searches for additional sources have turned up nothing. Rorshacma (talk) 17:06, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 17:21, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 17:21, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't pass notability at all. Exploreandwrite (talk) 09:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable and sourcing therein is an absolute joke. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 22:08, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet WP:GNG, delete as per WP:NPRODUCT - no significant coverage - even the creator company, Lugnut Studio, isn't notable enough for its own article - Epinoia (talk) 02:51, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lacks an indication of significance and notability as judged against WP:NPRODUCT.--SamHolt6 (talk) 17:06, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.