Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screamworks: Love in Theory and Practice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Screamworks: Love in Theory and Practice[edit]

Fails to meet WP:NALBUMS: an ubsubstantiated forthcoming album which has not even started production, has no third party references, and the sole reference which is supplied confirms that even the title is as yet unknown - the one given is a working title. Delete. I42 (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, no sources to verify title. My guess is they just threw the title up to dodge the WP:HAMMER. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:14, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment and delete: The information was taken from a radio interview with the lead singer. The interview is available and summarized here. However, beyond a tentative title and release date, there really isn't much information yet to have a full article just yet. Fezmar9 (talk) 20:56, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a "working title" shouldn't save it from the WP:HAMMER; fails WP:NALBUMS anyway. JohnCD (talk) 13:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.