Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Wright (American football)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 07:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Scott Wright (American football)[edit]
- Scott Wright (American football) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject has questionable notability; article is written like a marketing piece Jweiss11 (talk) 06:26, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless reliable sources are furnished that discuss Scott Wright himself in depth. I found plenty of sources quoting him commenting on the NFL draft, but only one that may discuss him as a person in a biographical way. Unfortunately, that source is hidden behind a pay wall, and all I could find were tantalizing hints. I can't be sure how significant the coverage was. Cullen328 (talk) 07:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't see sufficient coverage in the mainstream media in which Wright is the subject of the coverage. The items I see are passing references to his opinion about a player in connection with stories about the draft. Cbl62 (talk) 17:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it looks a little like an advertisement. Not entirely, but that coupled with the reasons above lands me here.--Paul McDonald (talk) 05:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.