Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Woodward (marketing executive)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Woodward (marketing executive)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The best source in this article is Associated Press: "Scott Woodward’s career has been nothing short of remarkable. With his keen eye for creativity and unwavering work ethic, Woodward has risen to the top of the advertising industry through a journey that has been both interesting and unexpected." we are told - the issue being that this is 'contributed content' - a press release. Little else exists here to demonstrate notability - passing mentions, (gushy) interviews and pieces about the brands the subject has worked with. The edit history would also appear to involve the subject's own work on this page. All in all, we clearly fail WP:GNG once we get beyond the window dressing. Even the picture was uploaded by an SPA... Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Advertising, and United States of America. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Athletic director out in Washington State that has coverage, nothing for this fellow. Flowery language and PR stuff used for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 13:06, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
KeepThe contributions of this subject seem noteworthy. It also aligns with WP:GNG. Additionally, the account that was editing the page was tagged for vandalism and all their edits have been reverted. Please check history of the page to confirm. The sources can be improved with research but the page should be kept. Editingforgk (talk) 10:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 07:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:53, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NOTLINKEDIN, very standard professional profile. If the subject meets WP:N, delete history / TNT and allow interested editors to write an encyclopedia article in its place. —siro χ o 11:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not enough here to justify a standalone article for this person. Possibly some COI here as well. User:Let'srun 18:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.