Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Tsumura

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Tsumura[edit]

Scott Tsumura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extremely poorly sourced WP:RESUME-like BLP. He's been involved in a lot of projects but I don't see any claim to notability here. FalconK (talk) 06:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 06:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 06:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 06:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 06:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 06:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 06:08, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Wikipedia is not a place to post resumes.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: per nom and above. At least for me: I found this Polygon source on Google, but that's it. It's not even mainly about him. Google does not determine GNG though, so I'd recommend searching more, but if this is the only thing, then RIP. GeraldWL 12:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.