Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Sewperman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:DGG per CSD A7, "Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject." (Non-administrator discussion closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:08, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Sewperman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable pornographic actor with a role in only one film. Judging from the fact that the article's creator is "Sewperman" this is a possible autobiography. Beerest355 Talk 19:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page obviously is a vanity page built by the subject. Should be deleted, no question. Icarus of old (talk) 21:29, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I don't see any credible assertion of notability in the article. I'll do a deeper search for reliable sources later. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Good point. I just nominated it for speedy deletion under A7. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:32, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:PORNBIO — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. My searches for reliable source coverage got absolutely nothing. Fails GNG. Fails PORNBIO with no awards or nominations. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Probably an autobiography; non-notable. APerson (talk!) 14:22, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.