Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Political

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:00, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Political[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NORG. Every link is dead, can't verify if any were substantial enough to count towards notability. Searching finds nothing else. Surprisingly, the org's own website now seems to be an online clothing store. Ref 5, originally a primary source to some page at the org's website is now a 404 error at the clothing store. The article is an orphan, most of it can't be substantiated, and there are no sources to improve it and validate the subject is notable. MB 23:11, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 00:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 00:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 00:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. IABot freaked out at one of those ref links which mostly didn’t look very promising anyway.
Delete. Not notable. Kablammo (talk) 18:36, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I can't find any mentions to the organisation at all. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:28, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.