Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Menzel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Menzel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBLP and WP:GNG. The notability of this individual is not established independently of his company, the Hollywood Critics Association. All the coverage he has received is in context of a series of related controversies involving his company. In fact, about 70% of the content on this page is copied from the company's Wikipedia page. Notability is not inherited, please see WP:INVALIDBIO, WP:BIO1E and WP:PSEUDO. Beyond these controversies, there is very little biographical information and that is cited to low-quality sources such as Muck Rack, alumni sites, and the 'about' page of a primary source. Teemu.cod (talk) 22:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Film. Teemu.cod (talk) 22:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the page should be deleted as the notability of this individual is not established independently of his company, the Hollywood Critics Association/Hollywood Creative Alliance. AnneNonnyMouse (talk) 01:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Internet, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Contributor892z (talk) 05:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd for deletion, supposedly by the article subject, so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.