Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Jessop (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 20:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Jessop[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable YouTuber, whose coverage comes from other Youtubers and a garbage tier TV show that try to capitalize on his failed personal life. Catlemur (talk) 10:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep He has received coverage both in connection with his TV show and in connection with the Sundance Film Festival, so he passes WP:BLP1E. However, despite being from high-quality sources like the WSJ and the LA Times, the Sundance-related coverage seems like human interest reporting, so only a weak keep. Mlb96 (talk) 22:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Some of the sourcing, like the Salt Lake Tribune article which only mentions the subject in a caption, is poor. However I feel there is sufficient coverage in the Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal articles, and these are both major publications, for this article to be kept. NemesisAT (talk) 16:24, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.