Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Herriott
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:48, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Scott Herriott[edit]
- Scott Herriott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Bigfoot hunter fails WP:GNG and requires significant coverage in reliable sources. Local awards do not establish notability or importance. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:02, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is simply no significant coverage in reliable sources:WP:GNG. I was unable to verify the most significant claim "hosted the Disney Channel's First Season of Walt Disney World Inside Out" as one link was dead and the other failed to fully load. Kooky2 (talk) 13:32, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Bigfoot doesn't exist and neither should this article. Utterly fails any notability policy you want to name. Qworty (talk) 10:54, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking reliable sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:27, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.