Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Evans (television personality)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:24, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Evans (television personality)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A TV Personality (host?) that doesn't pass WP:ENT nor WP:GNG (nor WP:JOURNALIST, which technically applies). Only sources I can find are passing mentions about him conducting an interview for example:[1], [2], [3], and [4]. The search Access Hollywood's Scott Evans will bring up plenty of passing mentions. menaechmi (talk) 15:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC) menaechmi (talk) 15:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:25, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:25, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 15:25, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing here in the article supports a claim of notability and no sources found in a Google search that would improve the article. Alansohn (talk) 18:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He literally stands on red carpets with a mic and takes 'obviously we love this movie' statements from actors/actresses. That's the bare minimum to pass JOURNALIST, but nothing else. Nate • (chatter) 19:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete - Maybe one day, but not yet. At this point, he doesn't quite pass the requirements for notability. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.