Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Deckard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Scott Deckard[edit]
- Scott Deckard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to be notable, only sourced to IMDB. Largely edited by the subject Jac16888 Talk 23:31, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The correct name of this article is Scott Tatman. There is nothing to support the change of the article's name. Searchs to determine the notablity of this actor should be based on the correct name of the actor. I have added the appropriate tags for the article to be moved back to the correct location.
The editor who is claiming to be the subject is probably a hoax- this user changed the name of the article to various new names in a single day -it is unlikely to be the subject of this article.Singularity42 (talk) 03:24, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A search under the correct name reveals additional hits, but not enought to satisfy WP:NACTOR. Appears to have had a few minor guest/extra rolls on televeision shows. His stage performances do not appeaer to have had any significant coverage. Singularity42 (talk) 03:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The article is discussed at Wikipedia:Help desk#please delete Scott Tatman. The multiple moves are odd but it doesn't sound so unlikely to me that the editor is the subject. PrimeHunter (talk) 03:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. I have changed my above comments accordingly. Singularity42 (talk) 03:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A minor actor of no consequence, at least as far as WP:GNG goes; there's no reliable biographies of him, no significant writing about his life or work. Having a job does not make one notable enough for an article. --Jayron32 04:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - even tho' he saves the kittehs - he's not yet prime time. Bearian (talk) 17:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as there are no sources which prove the subject meets our WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG guidelines. Comment: there are a couple of remarks on this AFD that seem a little uncivil, especially given the possibility that the article subject is monitoring this proceeding. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 02:27, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:55, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly fails notability guidelines - nothing but minor roles. Edward321 (talk) 21:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.