Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Ables

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Ables[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this musician. Joe Chill (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I had this PRODed yesterday. Agree with nomination. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 22:28, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, i found some coverage in 5 minutes. Pohick2 (talk) 17:49, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pohick or Merge into one of the bands he played in. Doc Quintana (talk) 05:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I assume Pohick2's sources are the ones now contained in the article. See WP:RS. None of these sources are "significant" or "non-trivial" and most are far from being "reliable". Mr Ables can be adequately discussed as a one-line mention in the articles on the bands he's played with. Notability is not inherited. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article's sourcing is insufficient; Google Web shows no discernible signs of nontrivial coverage by reliable secondary sources: [1], [2]. — Rankiri (talk) 13:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.