Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scosche Industries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scosche Industries[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1. Notability not est. in years, 2. Advert Widefox (talk) 09:05, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There's definitely some advertising here, however it might be better to fix the article rather than delete it.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; subject appears to meet requirements set forth in WP:ORG. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Search of Google finds only social media and sales sites. Search of Google News finds a few product reviews in the technical press. Nothing at all ABOUT the company. The article has an advertising tone and style but that could be fixed. The lack of significant coverage by independent reliable sources cannot be fixed. --MelanieN (talk) 00:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:34, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.