Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scientists Warning Europe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 11:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scientists Warning Europe[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BEFORE yielded no significant coverage in reliable sources, outside of passing mentions about their letter (supported by only 20 scientists) in relation to COP26. It seems to fail NORG and GNG. — The Most Comfortable Chair 12:00, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — The Most Comfortable Chair 12:09, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — The Most Comfortable Chair 12:09, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. — The Most Comfortable Chair 12:09, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — The Most Comfortable Chair 12:09, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The few quotes from the managing director in various articles do not constitute enough coverage to meet WP:NCORP. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unable to identify independent reliable sources or a merge target. Star Mississippi 02:51, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The only few sources from reliable outlets rely too much on self-publicity/PR of newsworthy events. More reliable sources are needed. Multi7001 (talk) 03:03, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.