Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schoortasche

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:26, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Schoortasche[edit]

Schoortasche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can find no evidence that such a term exists. Only hits are mirror sites. Vrac (talk) 20:15, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Holland-related deletion discussions. Vrac (talk) 01:43, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as this would've actually seemed best for the Hudson Valley article but there's simply no obviousness of improvement. BTW Vrac how was it you found this article? SwisterTwister talk 05:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I found it in the orphanage. Know any Dutch-speaking editors? Maybe one could shed some light on this term. Vrac (talk) 13:11, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 16:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 15:17, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The etymology is nonsense, there is no evidence of use, and I suspect this is a hoax to be pronounced "short-ass".--Andreas Philopater (talk) 09:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - etymology aside, article fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.