Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/School diva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. Sting au Buzz Me... 23:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

School diva[edit]

seems to have original research issues. probably better at MetaWiki. whole heap of these on a "Roles in Schools" template so test case to see what community thinks? unencyclopedic and no sources per WP:RS. Sting au Buzz Me... 00:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uncertain about this one but I think most or all of the articles in that template are perfectly OK. With respect to this one, it could probably be improved into a decent article , but it should not just be about fictional portrayals. Teacher's pet though almost entirely about fiction is a useful disam page, as there are multiple notable works with that title. Class clown was almost empty and deleted as an expired prod, Student athlete was a joke page, and should probably be re-created properly. The other student ones seem perfectly OK to me as articles, though they need sources. The school staff ones could all be sourced very easily from any textbook of school administration. DGG (talk) 02:18, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added citations to this article in order to demonstrate notability. I created the template, and along the way added the Template:Citations missing to almost every article. However, I used that template rather than Template:Notability because these are clearly notable topics. Commonly the topic of popular cultural references, there is also a growing body of literature surrounding student roles in schools. I really don't want to do all of the work inherent in demonstrating that, but if these articles were put up for AfD I would work against them. • Freechild'sup? 04:24, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn per work by Freechild. Well done. Close as keep. Sting au Buzz Me... 05:32, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.