The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 08:38, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Some unencyclopedic schoolcruft with local spook-tales. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 14:30, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOR. PJM 15:09, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, if we can get a cleanup and sources. Stifle 00:19, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Dalbury(Talk) 02:16, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unverifiable. --Bachrach44 16:47, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
