Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scholastica Nigeria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not substantially contested. Can be userfied, though not by me. Sandstein 18:18, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scholastica Nigeria[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic fails our notability policy on the basis that reliable independent sources could not be found aside education-related blogs —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 23:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 23:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 23:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

comment I think it is rather appropriate that we do our best to develop an article than speedily nominating it for deletion(AfD). Clearly Scholastica Nigeria is notable as covered on search engine and would only need more references. And the educational blogs that was referred to are know to produce clear, consice and accurate educational information.

‎Mahveotm, kindly familiarize yourself with the WP:GNG essay. A subject is said to be notable when it is covered by multiple independent reliable sources, not search engines. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 08:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Oluwa2Chainz Thanks for the link I've re-read it to be sure the was nothing I missed the first time I did, and obviously Scholastica Nigeria scales the Notability requirement. As earlier stated this article just needs additional references which I might not be able to provide due to my busy schedules. You said "A subject is said to be notable when it is covered by multiple independent reliable sources, not search engines" but what makes up search engines results if not sometimes the INDEPENDENT RELIABLE SOURCES. Have a nice time editing!!!!Mahveotm (talk) 15:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Userify to give user:Mahveotm a chance to find actual sources. Mahveotm, please see further note left on your talk page. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FDelete - Nn notable education programme. Fails GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:04, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.