Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schmarmy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Flower party■ 02:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Schmarmy[edit]

Contested prod. Looks like an ad for amateur fiction masquerading as a dictionary definition. It doesn't seem encyclopedic to me, with or without the tripod link. Delete. NickelShoe (Talk) 02:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Joe 02:53, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to wikt:Smarmy. Delete. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 02:55, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not notable enough term to merit a redirect. Feezo (Talk) 03:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 04:05, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Hyphen5 07:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 14:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:54, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — TKD::Talk 16:59, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Surely smarmy? ProhibitOnions 20:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Off hand used term. --Masssiveego 08:03, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 05:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.