Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schinty-six From the BBC's Numberwang
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 21:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Schinty-six From the BBC's Numberwang[edit]
- Schinty-six From the BBC's Numberwang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
This seems to be a 'number' from a single episode of a not espcially notable (although rather good) television seires. Its fancruft at best, and should be combined into the Numberwang page or deleted. Neo 21:17, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as it is currently spelled, there is only this article as a search result in Google. Searching for "Shinty-six" provides miore results but they all appear to be blog links and whatnot. No reliable sources.
- Speedy delete as a {{db-repost}} of Schinty-six by the same author, deleted three times by me earlier this month! Non-notable fictional number, by the way. (aeropagitica) 22:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the series was excellent but this is an incredibly minor gag from one sketch in one episode, definitely not deserving of an article to itself. ChrisTheDude 23:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: the "imaginary numbers" round might be worthy of a sentence in the Numberwang article, but no more. --RFBailey 00:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Not worth an article on its own. ISD 13:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Unless more info is put into the article. 86.20.53.195 17:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Do Not Delete - this is a great article for anyone who is interested in Numberwang, Mitchell and Webb or anyone who is interested in this sort of stuff. Please don't delete it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gizmo3200 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.