Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schöneiche bei Berlin tramway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS (talk|c|em) 17:47, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Schöneiche bei Berlin tramway[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable tram system. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:RAILOUTCOMES. The German Wikipedia article de:Straßenbahn_Schöneiche_bei_Berlin (and others: there are no less than 7 language version articles) offers us a much better picture. This tiny, placeholder-ish stub needs expansion, not deletion. I can see no reason why WP:RAILOUTCOMES would not apply to this rail network comprising 20 stations. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've added {{Expand German|Straßenbahn Schöneiche bei Berlin|date=March 2017}} to the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per reasons stated above. Expansion of article will be beneficial. --NoGhost (talk) 22:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per Shawn in Montreal. Nördic Nightfury 14:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - A well developed and historic rail line. The nom could've just clicked the German WP link and avoided this. --Oakshade (talk) 04:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Shawn in Montreal's reasoning and arguments. Ejgreen77 (talk) 15:49, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.