Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarlet Grace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 04:45, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scarlet Grace[edit]

Scarlet Grace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable per WP:NACTOR: no significant coverage in WP:Reliable sources online. IMDB entry says she will have a minor role in an upcoming film, but there's no significant coverage of that online either. She's made a good start to her career, but WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopaedia article. Proposed deletion contested by article creator. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 14:53, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Too soon although she has work coming down the pike. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I agree that it is a little too soon. Maybe with a little more coverage in the future, this can be reconsidered. Peter303x (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not enough coverage. -- LACaliNYC 23:50, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.