Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarborough Highlands Expressway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scarborough Highlands Expressway[edit]

Pure conjecture; concept has no status with the province or city and is only a proposal the CAA tried to promote in 2003 (with no mention of Highway 448 designation). Bjhtn 04:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; WP:NOT a crystal ball, also lacks WP:RS for many statements. Sandstein 05:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't think the real roads are that notable. The theatrical ones are definitely non notable. --MarsRover 05:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; WP:NOT a crystal ball. JohnM4402 06:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, needs sources to verify article. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Highway planning and construction in Canada tends to provoke a lot of debate, particularly when it involves a lot of damage to nature or demolishing homes. Occupation of the affected land by protestors is also commonplace. And there is also likely to be debate over whether the highway should be publicly owned. In short, it's not a highway yet, but it will be a topic for debate. TruthbringerToronto 20:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Has anyone debated it yet? Media coverage? If not, delete. Fagstein 01:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Scarborough Expressway, which was definitely a real proposal that resulted in some ramp stubs on the Gardiner Expressway. --SPUI (T - C) 18:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.