Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scandinavian collage museum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:30, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scandinavian collage museum[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. I found very little coverage for this. also given it's a converted bus shelter not sure how significant a museum it is. compared to other art museums we have in WP which tend to be well established buildings. LibStar (talk) 03:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's a (small) art museum. It's a public attraction. It's a roadside attraction. It is covered in newspapers and other sources. I notice numerous separate individual artists' resumes/webpages mentioning their showing pieces in exhibits there, and there is news coverage in Peru and other countries such as [http://mobi.peruthisweek.com/news-peruvian-collage-artist-participates-in-norway-show-111153/ this article in "Peru this week". Based on its apparently small size alone, I sort of question how monumental an achievement it is to exhibit there, and I think it is a service for Wikipedia to show exactly what it is, as a reference to persons trying to evaluate the artists' work for any reason. --do ncr am 04:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:33, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - interesting but not notable. No significant reliable sources are provided to suggest notability. Sorry, but Wikipedia is not intended to be a "service" for persons evaluating an artist's work.--Rpclod (talk) 02:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Did a search in a database of 100+ Norwegian media outlets. The museum is mentioned in one - 1 - news piece, the one in tiny Opdalingen which is cited in the current article. The museum has not gained any media attention whatsoever. Geschichte (talk) 20:26, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Selective merge and redirect to Berkåk. --Hegvald (talk) 09:48, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

disagree with merge as it's such a minor museum with close to no media attention. LibStar (talk) 09:55, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability beyond the limited sourcing in the article now. I can't even find an article on the Norwegian Wikipedia. [[1]] It's hard to argue that it's more notable over here than there. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 20:36, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.