Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scandelion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:54, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scandelion[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another editor placed a PROD for notability which was promptly removed by the article's creator. Eeekster (talk) 00:07, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails under WP:BAND: unsigned band (no record label), no evidence of ever having had a major label release, no evidence of concerts other than as support/opening act, and no other evidence of notability. --Closeapple (talk) 03:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Certainly they're good, and it's a great style, but I'm just not finding anything that says they're notable. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 04:13, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per notablity. HHaeyyn89 (talk) 20:33, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.